Describe the board.
Open it in KiCad.
Tell Typmax what you're building — an ESP32 with a sensor, a GPS logger, something on a LiPo. It picks real parts, wires them the way the datasheets say, and hands you a KiCad project you own.
And it shows its working. Every check comes with the arithmetic behind it — so you can see why that resistor is 4.7 kΩ, and disagree if you want to.
Not open yet. Seats go out in small batches — the waitlist is how you get one.
A folder you open in KiCad.
Not a picture of a circuit. The actual project files — schematic, parts list, connections — in KiCad's own formats, yours to edit, keep and send to a board house. Nothing is locked behind a plan.
Four things wrong with the board above.
The 3.3 V supply is specified to hold a tighter window than the regulator's own feedback resistors can actually deliver at their tolerance corners — so every check downstream was computed against a voltage the board never guarantees.
The radio's chip-select pin floats while the processor is still booting, so the radio can select itself and treat whatever the boot ROM happens to be doing as instructions. And the diode protecting the regulator is rated for a third of the current the regulator can push through it.
None of that is visible by looking at the drawing. All of it is arithmetic against the datasheets — and each one is a board you paid for and cannot use.
For comparison, KiCad’s own electrical rule check runs on this same file and reports 50 violations — 46 of them simply pins nobody wired. Both tools are right; they are answering different questions. ERC asks whether the drawing is wired. Typmax asks whether the numbers work.
Generate it. Check it. Change it.
Four things, in the order we're building them. Three of them work today.
Generate
Describe the board in a sentence. Get a schematic built from parts that exist, that you can buy.
Check
Every number checked against the datasheet it came from — pull-ups, rail budgets, logic levels, decoupling, missing connections.
Change
Swap a part, move a pin, raise the bus speed. Edits are small and surgical — what you fixed stays fixed, and everything is re-checked.
Lay out
The board itself — placement and routing, with the electrical checks re-run on real trace lengths instead of assumptions.
Bringing a schematic you already have is on the way too — what works today.
The AI plans. It doesn't hold the pen.
Ask a language model to draw a circuit from memory and it will drop a pull-up and never notice. So it doesn't get to draw. It only proposes changes — "add this part, connect that pin" — and code that reads datasheets does the rest.
Describe it
"ESP32-S3, a BME280 sensor, GPS, running off a 3.3 V rail."
Plans the edits
Small, reversible steps. It never writes a file and never remembers your design.
Engineers it
Real part records, wiring by rule, every value computed and cited — never recalled.
Open it in KiCad
Your files, your board. Plus the report saying why each check passed — or didn't.
Counted from the repository on 10 September 2026. We publish the numbers as they move.
Six boards, every check run.
Real designs the engine compiles and checks today. Every number below came out of the engine on this build — none of it is typed by hand, and the page goes red in CI if it drifts.
The LiPo charger ends in human review however many checks pass — battery, mains and motor drive always do.
What it can't do yet.
We'd rather you read this here than find out on a board.
It stops before the PCB
You get the schematic and the project. Placing and routing the board is still yours — for now.
It won't invent a circuit
It assembles known parts and proven sub-circuits. A novel analog front end is not what this is.
Anything dangerous ends with a human
LiPo charging, mains, motor drive: it runs every check it has, then tells you a person has to sign it off. That never gets softened.
Tell us what you're building.
Seats open in small batches as the catalog grows — and the parts you name go to the front of the queue to be checked against their datasheets.
Bring a board you're stuck on and get an honest read on whether Typmax helps yet — a reply from me, not a form.
[email protected] →




